![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
meimichiIt's time for another wacky installment!
I might end up moving SV art to its own journal if I somehow find myself keeping this up. Hrm.
First, the inevitable cheap joke:
I am forever grateful to the show that reference caps of Sam Witwer's shirtless bod take less than a minute to track down. YOU ARE GOOD FORSOME THINGS ONLY ONE THING, SMALLVILLE.
Aaaaand the even cheaper joke:
You might ask, "Are Chlark in their pajamas? Can one construe from this image that they may, as it were, be sexing it up in Offscreensville?"
However, in keeping with Smallville storytelling policy, I have chosen to leave this answer *~AMBIGUOUS~*!
THEY COULD BE HAVING A TOTALLY PLATONIC SLEEPOVER, OR THEY COULD BE FUCKING! BELIEVE WHAT YOU WILL! DEBATE YOUR THEORIES IN THE COMMENTS! RUN WILD!
...I like my version of ambiguity much better than the show's.
I might end up moving SV art to its own journal if I somehow find myself keeping this up. Hrm.
First, the inevitable cheap joke:
I am forever grateful to the show that reference caps of Sam Witwer's shirtless bod take less than a minute to track down. YOU ARE GOOD FOR
Aaaaand the even cheaper joke:
You might ask, "Are Chlark in their pajamas? Can one construe from this image that they may, as it were, be sexing it up in Offscreensville?"
However, in keeping with Smallville storytelling policy, I have chosen to leave this answer *~AMBIGUOUS~*!
THEY COULD BE HAVING A TOTALLY PLATONIC SLEEPOVER, OR THEY COULD BE FUCKING! BELIEVE WHAT YOU WILL! DEBATE YOUR THEORIES IN THE COMMENTS! RUN WILD!
...I like my version of ambiguity much better than the show's.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2009-04-06 09:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-06 09:43 am (UTC)